Over 59604

Coulter Politics


'In the war on women... -

MITT ROMNEY - “I think we’ve had enough of hip. Hip has nearly wrecked the country. Let’s try square for a while.” Ann Coulter

Religious Freedom -

TAGS: coulter bigotry
Rating: 3.86/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Ron2 - April 26, 2013, 4:52 am
Nice 5 lyons.
StoneTools - April 25, 2013, 11:18 pm
if maher and maddow had a kid it would look like papafox
StoneTools - April 25, 2013, 11:17 pm
that implies that you watch her
Rudedog - April 25, 2013, 9:22 pm
If Coulter and Hannity had a kid it would look like Limbaugh and post like Vik.
PapaFox - April 25, 2013, 7:19 pm
Apparently Fox News does. I cringe every time I see her.
Doggit - April 25, 2013, 7:16 pm
Does anyone actually listen to her?

A Badge of Honor! -


TAGS: ann coulter twitter
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

arnnatz - October 28, 2012, 1:41 am
Obama joked to Leno that his average score of 129 [in bowling] "was like the Special Olympics or something."
GrouchoMarxist - October 27, 2012, 6:46 pm
Was it those extra Chromosome Conservatives?
thatmfguy - October 27, 2012, 5:53 pm
That'd be an awfully generous description of them.
JGalt - October 27, 2012, 5:08 pm
campaign commercial: because celebs can't comprehend the real issues: http://now.msn.com/rosie-perez-blasts-mitt-romney-in-sarcastic-campaign-video
foxrecon19d - October 27, 2012, 4:31 pm
EPIPHANY_ You just called Obama supporters "MENTALLY HANDICAPPED"
foxrecon19d - October 27, 2012, 4:30 pm
Benghazi, WHAT? Sadly, this IS all they have left...a pathetic attempt to focus Obama's base away from reality. A once great political party has sold it's soul to a demi-god who was a failure long before he became president.
thatmfguy - October 27, 2012, 4:20 pm
So it was mentally handicapped VS mentally ill. This is what we've come to?!?!?!


THE TRUTH HURTS - "If Romney is our nominee, we will lose."

How do you cure an American Tea Party extremist of racism? -

TAGS: ann coulter tea party racism
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

birddseedd - August 7, 2014, 10:27 pm
ph**oshop, spreading lies ever since liberals learnt how to use it.

YEP - Thought so...

PITY... - The criminals are not happy this year.


DEMONIC - You can find this delightful screed in "RELIGION" under the subsection of "INQUISITIONAL TEXTS."

ANN COULTER - The only human in America who looks down her nose at the 9-11 widows, widowers and orphans

How do you turn an American Conservative extremist into a joke? -

TAGS: ann coulter tweet funny
Rating: 1.8/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

birddseedd - August 8, 2014, 10:49 am
cant say i know anything about her.
fauxnews - August 7, 2014, 11:26 pm
I know, right? Because Coulter NEVER does that... :roll eyes": She's made herself a target. It's like a school yard kid who cries to his mum, "Wah! That kid hit me back." She's fair game given her antagonistic lifestyle. She has a thick enough skin.
birddseedd - August 7, 2014, 10:28 pm
childish name calling, now thats a way to prove facts

Pundit wisdom -

Wonder Why the GOP Establishment Is Hated & Why Trump Is Surging? -

Boom goes the dynamite -

TAGS: republican rage ann coulter
Rating: 4.29/5

More politifakes by guest818

guest818 - June 26, 2015, 4:04 pm
Hand the man a cigar
Throckmorton - June 26, 2015, 9:21 am
Oh the irony.

Imagine if the mother of Ann Coulter was Pro-choice? -

If Tea Party bigots actually believed in the diarrhea they are spouting... -

TAGS: pro life pro birth coulter conception hypocrites
Rating: 3.84/5

More politifakes by Dwydwyyr

Dwydwyyr - August 14, 2015, 6:50 pm
See, you can't tell truth from delusions. Still waiting for that logical debate or factual data, you're confusing truth with delusions again ...oh wait,that is an obstinant TeaParty Conservative discussion. Agree to disagree OTC. Have a good week, cheers.
OTC - August 14, 2015, 6:02 pm
2 RINOs, 4 liberals, thank you
Dwydwyyr - August 14, 2015, 2:22 pm
Tsk.Apparently one where sarcasm exists.Even so,what was I thinking?You're right.Everyone knows Bush&Reagan were conservative,the ones who appointed Roberts&Kennedy.You mean,conservatives are to blame for the activist bias of the SCOTUS?Thank you for that
OTC - August 14, 2015, 11:51 am
Two of the most liberal presidents in history??? What parallel universe are you in?
Dwydwyyr - August 13, 2015, 12:03 am
Ronald Reagan appointed Justice Kennedy and George W.Bush appointed Chief Justice Roberts. Leave it to those two, two of America's most f***ing liberal Presidents in history to screw up the Supreme Court! Wait a sec...
OTC - August 12, 2015, 10:55 pm
You might want to rethink Roberts and Kennedy
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 7:30 pm
Abortion wont be overturned for the same reason prohibition & slavery will not be touched.Culturally, it's a settled matter and the left & right(more of less)have evolved to accept it as part of the social fabric.Of course,extremists will always whine CYL
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 7:25 pm
When the Congress and President was stacked with conservatives, they could've tried to overturn abortion rights, they didn't. Bush was silent on the issue. Last I checked, the Supreme Court is five Conservatives and four liberals.
OTC - August 12, 2015, 7:21 pm
Because the SCOTUS is stacked with liberal activists?
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 4:32 pm
But that hasn't worked for you. So why would I do that? Thanks for the advice, but as much as I appreciate you sharing with me your debate "philosophy", “ranting" about dead lions hasn't helped your cause.There's a reason my side won the pro-choice debate
OTC - August 12, 2015, 3:15 pm
Keep ranting, you might accidentally make a valid point
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 2:21 pm
The abortion debate isn't gonna be decided between us 2 anons bickering on Politifake.That's why democracy was invented,and that's what elections are for.Remind me again,how has that's been working out for you on the abortion issue? I'm smiling here TTFN
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 2:13 pm
You made an unnecessary drugs remark against liberals, you can't tell me that wasn't an insult against liberals or born of emotion. Conservatives are no more saints than libtards on this issue. Hurts your credibility when you are so deliberately obtuse
OTC - August 12, 2015, 1:58 pm
Gotta love how a sentence or two is considered anger, while that leads to a long rant of nothing but insults and attacks and that's not not anger, lol
OTC - August 12, 2015, 1:55 pm
Still waiting for that logical debate or factual data, all you have done so far is attack and insult. But then again, liberals think attacking and insulting IS a logical debate and facts
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 1:22 pm
*Tsk. three posts? that wasn't me. I only hit "post reply" once. Neato site glitch, though - internet echo. The chasm between the left and right on abortion is so large, appropriately ironic.
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 1:16 pm
Over the years, I learned that when it comes to abortion, conservatives are easily angered, so they cannot HAVE a logical debate WITH OTHERS or ACCEPT factual data,so THEY attack and make/rely exclusively on fallacies,a sign of intellectual weakness. TTFN
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 1:13 pm
Over the years, I learned that when it comes to abortion, conservatives are easily angered, so they cannot HAVE a logical debate WITH OTHERS or ACCEPT factual data,so THEY attack and make rely/exclusively on fallacies,a sign of intellectual weakness. TTFN
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 1:11 pm
Over the years, I learned that when it comes to abortion, conservatives are easily angered, so they cannot HAVE a logical debate WITH OTHERS or ACCEPT factual data,so THEY attack and make rely exclusively on fallacies,a sign of intellectual weakness. TTFN
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 1:10 pm
By the way, that fallacious argument was brought to you by a fallacy called a red herring - example."Little Susie was caught cheating but that's not fair since Bill the teacher was caught cheating on his wife." Symptomatic of a losing argument
Dwydwyyr - August 12, 2015, 1:04 pm
Fundies comparing Cecil the lion to abortion,one of which laughably has absolutely nothing to do with the other.You dont need to worry about libs stopping the drugs.Sounds like the conservatards are hitting the drugs so hard there's not enough to go'round
OTC - August 12, 2015, 10:32 am
I see, killing an unborn human is justifiable, but killing a lion (that kills other animals) should be a death penalty. Liberals should try the "Stop doing drugs" challenge.
Dwydwyyr - August 11, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, though I approve of that very special circumstance, that is not a loophole for Xtian nutters to yell "Ah ha!" and outlaw ALL abortions in order to impose their anti-democracy, hegemonic values on others. Fundies want a Xtian theocracy. F*ck that
Dwydwyyr - August 11, 2015, 9:41 pm
The law, as imperfect as it is, has to draw a line somewhere. Not a perfect world. I am okay with that for obvious reasons. No one has a right to make that decision for the mother. It's a case of aggravated murder, hence the imperfect two count strategy
OTC - August 11, 2015, 8:55 pm
And yet, if someone murders a pregnant woman resulting in the death of the unborn, that person can be charged with two counts of capital murder
Dwydwyyr - August 11, 2015, 5:58 pm
We are discussing what legally constitutes "a life" for the societal purpose of prosecuting laws for murder, death certificates, etc. If fundies really thought ALL cells are precious life, they'd outlaw Fox News.How many brain "cells" does that kill? CYL
Dwydwyyr - August 11, 2015, 5:55 pm
What "Im "saying" is I dont believe the govt has a right to call abortion murder. The Fundy Churches can morally call it anything they want.No one in govt is outlawing their religious freedom to call it a sin or send me to a make-believe hell.
OTC - August 11, 2015, 5:26 pm
So you're saying a baby is dead until it is born, then it instantly comes to life?
OTC - August 11, 2015, 5:21 pm
*the day one starts breathing air
Dwydwyyr - August 11, 2015, 5:17 pm
It's not about what makes "me" feel better.I feel great, abortion is legal.If it makes"you"feel better,Bdays are given the day a person is born because it reflects common sense,the day civilized people have always recognized when life practically begins.
OTC - August 11, 2015, 4:28 pm
If it makes you feel better, people have "baby showers" which is a pre-birth celebration
Dwydwyyr - August 11, 2015, 3:53 pm
Fundies wanna say life begins at conception and an embryo deserves all the same rights as a person born does.Then that should include proper"age." They also seem to forget their inquisition beliefs.Trying to remember the word for that,it begins with H
Dwydwyyr - August 11, 2015, 3:42 pm
Your argument fails even by your "own logic" since fundies don't say life begins when the building blocks of life like sp3rm or the egg are hanging out seperate, just when they finally come together.
Dwydwyyr - August 11, 2015, 3:38 pm
Tsk. It would be nice if you used my logic or even "logic" in general. Your argument fails since machines, trucks and the like aren't life according to your fundy pseudologic.
OTC - August 11, 2015, 12:26 pm
Sure, using that logic, my truck is made from iron ore and runs pretty good for a 600 million year old truck
Dwydwyyr - August 10, 2015, 7:21 pm
Whatever you'd decide to call IT would be up to the Xtians(LifeBeginsDay?).As it stands,I call it what IT IS:fundy hypocrisy.The same reason why they dont have funerals for early miscarriages.Because the agenda was NEVER pro-life.It was Pro-XtianHegemony
Dwydwyyr - August 10, 2015, 7:13 pm
Sure. It has nothing to do with the fact that fundies and the religious zealots are nuts. If life begins at conception, then the fundies would chronicle the beginning of your life in terms of age starting at conception. You don't.
OTC - August 10, 2015, 4:08 pm
The "birth" in birthday wasn't a clue as to why we celebrate birthdays and not conceptionday?

Ann Coulter -

TAGS: ann coulter gross ugly
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by Dwydwyyr

mittromney - August 22, 2015, 12:56 pm
/Speaking about "imbalances", looks like God gave Coulter that hormonal imbalance which accounts for her Adam's apple because {let's be honest} you don't ask sissies like Bush and Trump to do a man's job, especially when that man is Ann Coulter/ =)
Cyberhagen - August 22, 2015, 12:19 pm
Yes, and that's when he made Pelosi, Hillary, and Warren. So to make amends, he made Ann to redress the imbalance. :-p

liberal tolerance -

TAGS: ann coulter liberal intolerance
Rating: 2.14/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 2, 2015, 7:47 pm

To the rest I say Well done! For being a decent human being and treating others as you'd like to be treated. You are the people who actually care about your country and the people who live there.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 2, 2015, 7:45 pm

...that you insist on coming back here time and time again with a new Nic and pretending to be "a friend" of the banned or some random stranger with matching opinions....To you I say...Keep it coming. I will not be intimidated or bullied by you people.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 2, 2015, 7:42 pm

...of the site, both sides have accused me of favoring the other in exactly the same ways, That would be IMPOSSIBLE. So, to those of you who send me rambling PMs about how I treat the other guy differently and those of you who are so sad and lonely...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 2, 2015, 7:40 pm

Now, for the rest of you.... I know that some of you think I favour some members over others, you think I don't apply the rules evenly and accuse me of every possible sin under the sun. Well, I don't CARE. I treat you all the same based on the rules...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 2, 2015, 7:37 pm

Emmaroydes Ladies and gentlemen. In what I hope was her/his/it's last performance. It's getting old Emma.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 2, 2015, 7:33 pm

Bye now.
DudleyDoRight - March 2, 2015, 5:36 pm
I can read. can you? You have a serious problem with the language huh frenchy? clearly I said you “showed him the door.” I never said anything about “banning” anyone. don’t put words in my mouth. Do they wear flip flops in canada? you seem all stocked up
Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 2, 2015, 4:02 pm

Work on your reading skills Dudley. I didn't ban Faux, never said I did. But if you keep speaking to me the way you just did you might find yourself taking a little time out.
DudleyDoRight - March 2, 2015, 3:53 pm
don't let the door hit you on the way out skippy. Thank you mooo for showing this miscreant the door. not that I should thank you for finally doing your job. Maybe now politifake will finally return to normal. Imagine that!
DudleyDoRight - March 2, 2015, 3:51 pm
Now-now. Don't hurt faux's feelings. he hasn't had his paxil yet and he might get all riled up and start hyp***entilating again.
OTC - March 2, 2015, 2:32 pm
Calron, you'll eventually learn faux's doesn't debate the issue but rather your opinion and your name
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 9:58 pm
P.P.S. What? Did you think I was going to say, "Live long and prosper." That's cliche. Gimme more credit than that. X-D Cheers everyone! =)
calron - March 1, 2015, 9:58 pm
So you failed to understand my a***ogy on a very basic level, and then resorted to name calling and then rather than actually talking about the subject you went onto a false dilemma with your red herring.
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 9:57 pm
P.S.Guess I'll find out your decision when I log into my account tomorrow.lol.And to the other members,if this is my last hurrah,to quote the late great Leonard Nimoy,"A life is like a garden.Perfect moments can be had,but not preserved,except in memory."
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 9:52 pm
...so if this is personal for you,do what u have to do.I respect you as a mod,I think this site is doing great,and I like debating with the members.But do whatever you have to in order to make this site better.Even if that means saying BYE to me. Cheers=)
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 9:50 pm
...but if even after agreeing with you about it, it would make YOU HAPPY to ban me for a few days, well then, I can't stop you. Personally, I would rather you not. But I have a feeling this goes beyond LOLs. But I'm not a mind reader....
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 9:47 pm
I told you I was going to stop putting LOL after members names since it was "pissing you off." But it was obviously sarcastic, not thinly veiled sarcasm, and for sarcasm's sake. Not for "socking." I told you I'd respect your wishes and stop...
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 9:44 pm
I've had no problem in the past disagreeing with you in public about this issue, Moo+. I'm not admitting to anything other than being sarcastic and a bit of a smart a**.If I really had a problem about it,I would've reported it to you,like I've always done
Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 1, 2015, 9:34 pm

Don't worry, your "jokes" are definitely in the "less than" category. But if you're actually admitting that you were using that ploy to imply others were sock puppets....I'd be happy to ban you for a few days. 3? 5? What would make you happy?
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 8:08 pm
Oh, I would say it was less than thinly veiled. Sorry though. Couldn't resist. X-D Roger that, Moo+. I'll stop.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - March 1, 2015, 8:01 pm

Stop with the "(LOL) after members names, It's thinly veiled and starting to piss me off.
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 7:34 pm
*crickets* *crickets* That's what I thought. :-/ Well then, (B) it is. *again, in my best W.C. Fields voice* "Now go away kid, you bother me."
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 6:56 pm
So is it: (A) you actually care about my opinion since you obsessively went out of your way to reach out to me or (B) you are just going out of your way to provoke me with rubbish so I should ignore you as I should ignore any insecure person?Is it A or B?
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 6:49 pm
Here's the deal,"Calron"(lol): I make a poster, you comment on it. I offer to debate you, you run from the debate and whine. If you want to debate.GREAT! I'm all for it. But if you just want my attention, then just say so and I will ignore your trolling.
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 6:47 pm
Never called you any such thing.lol Remember, it is my opinion you are interested in. There is a reason I do NOT comment on your posters. It's because IMHO you don't know what you are talking about and IMAO you are phony. So I could care less what u think
calron - March 1, 2015, 6:43 pm
But as long as you do not attack the argument you have no point to make. And of course you can show they are wrong and call them poopyheads, rather than saying they are poopyheads to show they are wrong. One if valid, the other fallacy.
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 6:38 pm
Nah,I'll do what I want, thanks.This is a parody website:if I wanna make fun of Coulter and Breibart for being loud mouthed idiots,then more power to me.That Im right most of the time about them only sweetens the deal.But thx 4 the feedback,"Calron"(lol)
calron - March 1, 2015, 6:34 pm
Nope, a red herring is when you talk about something else as a distraction, but your trying a classic form of Ad Hominem and confusing a legal term with a fallacy. Try attacking the evidence presented instead.
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 6:33 pm
...it's not difficult when it's that obvious, unlike say, Ann Coulter's state of her sanity. On that, we'll never know.lol :-p
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 6:29 pm
My point with Breibart is that only a hardline conservative would ever cite Breibart to make his case. If someone cites Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity as a source, in a conversational loose debate like this we can a**ume your are probably a conservative
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 6:28 pm
Nah, turn the page in your Fallacies-for-dummies book to the chapter on red-herrings. Which is where you began. Then you relied on Breibart, which was CHAPTER: Fruit from the poisoned tree. And you retorted with another red-herring.
calron - March 1, 2015, 6:23 pm
ZSo instead of attacking the evidence that was presented in that article, you once again pull out the Ad Hominem.
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 6:01 pm
...next you will be telling m that Ann Coulter is actually a woman. Wait-
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 6:00 pm
In the hours immediately following Senator Ted Kennedy's death, Breitbart called Kennedy a "villain", a "duplicitous bastard", a "prick"[23] and "a special pile of human excrement". Yeah...Breibart is not a biased source.lol
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 5:46 pm
...albeit you had to fall off the fence you were sitting on. #BESTMASKFALLINGOFFMOMENTS
fauxnews - March 1, 2015, 5:46 pm
You just overplayed your hand. Breibart??? LMFAO ROFLCOPTER Breibart is considered a very biased source. Even Andrew himself has confessed to re-editing material to make liberals look bad. Well...at least we finally know where you stand...
calron - March 1, 2015, 5:09 pm
Ans what exactly did she say,http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/12/coulter-advocates-concealedcarry-laws-152048.html At least you got that part right.
calron - March 1, 2015, 5:08 pm
Well lets see:http://nypost.com/2014/10/12/the-fbis-bogus-report-on-mass-shootings/ Bad numbers. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/10/11/report-92-percent-of-mass-shootings-since-2009-occured-in-gun-free-zones/ shooting in gun free zones.

Republicans Said you can not put lipstick on a pig -

Republican Trolls -

Coulter -

Ann Coulter -